The blogosphere is currently abuzz with a case of Jamie Jones - a woman from Texas who was employed by Halliburton/KBR. She alleges she was gang-raped by her Halliburton co-workers, locked up without food or water for a day - and all of this just happened to be an active cover-up of Halliburton, and the U.S. Government that went on for 2 years.
While I cannot bring any expert knowledge to the details of the case and objectively judge the genuineness of her claims I found it quite amusing to read the responses of conservative bloggers. As you can guess, some of them are somewhat “dismissive” of her claims.

For instance “Jawa Report” calls her claims “Too perfect“. Really? Well of course, when according to them, “.. nearly every villain in the left’s panoply of villains is included in the story”. Interestingly enough, when the rape perpetrators are muslims “Jawa Report” didn’t display the same kind of incredulity - in fact they have a simple explanation ready (psst, it’s the evil feminists’/lesbians’ fault). Oh, that makes perfect sense.

Or take this fine gentleman pictured above who happens to be Ms Jamie Jones’ fellow Texan Chris Jones, a prominent conservative blogger for TheHotJoints and RedState. Here’s a direct quote from his blog:

“Immunity for “contractor on Iraqi” crime is one thing, but I never considered that immunity would extend to “contractor on contractor” crimes. Or more specifically “American on American” crimes. Shooting an Iraqi in a war zone is one thing, but American contractors gang-raping a 20-year old American woman is f*cking outrageous.”

So let me see if I understand. What Mr Jones is saying here is that killing, maiming and raping of Iraqi men/women/children when performed by American contractors is all fine and dandy, but if it’s done to a white woman we’ve gone too far. Outrageous, indeed.

The ultimate irony of this rather ugly situation is that the bloggers that seem to be displaying the most sympathy and compassion with regards to Miss Jones case are of the kind that she most likely despises the most. You know, tree hugging, godless, pinky, sandal-wearing hippies that kind.
Not that the leftist bloggers would ever be politically motivated…

A large number of billboards and bus stops in NYC have been recently occupied by this poster promoting the new Court TV series about psychic detectives. Since the subject matter seems to be popular with the masses, the question one needs to ask is: “How many crimes have real life psychic-abilities actually helped solve?”. As Court TV’s own crime library suggests it’s, ummm 0. That’s right ladies and gentlemen, there isn’t a single proven case on the record where a psychic who’s not been been an accomplice in a crime actually helped solve it. Sure, there is plenty of anecodal accounts, but you’d think with all those years of hard work there’d be at least one well-documented case? Well, there are a few of them to be sure, like this gem where a psychic has demonstrated his supernatural ability to ground the planes. In this case, I actually wonder who is more gullible the psychic, or the TSA officials who actually listened.

In conclusion. Since Court TV’s pitch for the show is “America’s most wanted meet America’s most clairvoyant” - I’m betting on the most wanted. At least their abilities are fairly well-documented.

Onto the main topic that brought this up: this oh-so-bright (as you are about to see) congressman Westmoreland from Georgia (wouldn’t you know it?) co-sponsored a bill to require the display of 10 Commandments in the House of Representatives. So, Stephen Colbert set up an interview and asked him non-chalantly what the 10 Commandments actually were. Since I’m posting this you can pretty much guess what the answer was:

Stephen Colbert Interviews congressman Westmoreland

Well now, today is June 6th, ‘06, and it seems that I’m still here. In fact, if you are reading this - chances are that you are still here too. The end of the world hasn’t happened, yet again. Granted, this date had a lot less fanfare attached to it compared with say Y2K, which just goes to show you that the doomsayers are finally learning, or at least they are playing it safe nowadays.

When it comes to doomsday [- or rapture, or the second coming as it’s known in some of the more popular mythologies] there seems to be no consensus on how to calculate the actual date. Homer Simpson thought that number of Filipinos in the Bible [- it’s zero, btw] had something to do with it. Most doomsayers got it so wrong so many times they hardly bother anymore.

Moreover, there are some dissenting folks out there who think that “666″ doesn’t even mean what we think it does. John Marshall, a professor of Early Christianity at the University of Toronto thinks the number refers to a roman emperor that the writer of Revelations particularly disliked:

“It seems very clear . . . from a historical point of view, the Book of Revelation is alluding to something in its time,” Marshall said. “It certainly doesn’t concern 2006 North America in a direct way.” (The London Free Press)

Wow. A statement from the ancient book does NOT.. concern 2006 North America.. in any direct way? B–b-But. Umm.. oh.. My world’s just gone topsy-turvy. But everything else in Revelations … must be true, right? RIGHT? I mean they wouldn’t call it “Revelations” if it didn’t reveal anything, that much I’m certain of.

So where does all of this leave us? Does today’s only significance lie in the fact that it helps to sell terrible movie flops? Or will we witness some supernatural, heavenly act, after all? There is still time until midnight. I don’t know about you, but I’m not holding my breath.